Philosothon Project
Application form for 2018
The creation of ‘Age Appropriate Resources’.
This subsidy will be available for individuals who contribute a short 2/3 page written piece of stimulus
material to be used in an upcoming Philosothon. Please note that this will relate primarily to

Secondary School Philosothons (Years 8-12) and should be tailored to this audience. Over the course
of the project this funding will total $4,500.00. ($300 per written piece) Successful applicants will be  
paid
an honorarium for stimulus material which deals with big philosophical questions. Please note
tha
t there are some areas that the funding cannot cover. Click here for a list of exemptions. People
can contribute material in any case but if they want it to be eligible for a honorarium they must make
sure th
e contribution does not cover the areas listed.  There is a max of three grants for a single
contributor. Please note that other formats will be considered e.g audio/video but ideally it will be a
written piece submitted.

The panel will consider the following criteria to select the awardees.

1.        Age appropriate
2.        Originality and relevance
3.        Balance of topics i.e we seek to cover a range of philosophical areas in a Philosothon

(
Metaphysics/Epistemology & Axiology) Please do not try to cover all three but make sure your
stimulus material fits within one area.
Name
School
Role
Email Address
Phone Number
Brief CV of the supervising teacher;
In submitting this application you are indicating that if your resource is selected  that  you are happy for us to use this
material as stimulus for a regional or Australasian Philosothon. You are also indicating that you are the author. We will
be placing your name on the stimulus material.
Cut and paste your stimulus material below- Then submit your application
If you need more room still submit but email resource as an attachment to
philosothon@yahoo,com
This project was made possible through the support of a grant from Templeton Religion Trust.
The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily
reflect the views of Templeton Religion Trust